Angie

4 days ago
‹ chat status

Profile

Name:
Angie
Location:
Marion, IL
Birthday:
11/06/1950
Status:
Married
Job / Career:
Education

Stats

Posts:
82
Post Reads:
1,823
Last Online:
4 days ago
Technorati:
blog reactions

Users Chatting

View All »

My Friends

online now
online now
47 min ago
48 min ago
57 min ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago

Subscribe

Life & Events > Apologizing for My Ignorance

  Apologizing for My Ignorance

Please accept my humble apology for posting the silly email that I received. Of course, I am using red to match the color of my blush. I do appreciate the comments and the information that I received since I am somewhat wiser than before. Something I have always believed is if you are in doubt, ask!


This cartoon is the closest in describing the position in which I found myself. Indeed I am the cat being scanned!



posted on Apr 29, 2008 11:50 AM ()

Comments:

I understand why you are apologizing, but there really is no need to. You may feel you have mistakenly posted something or caused discomfort unintentionally, but you DID STATE that you were sharing an email that you received. The information that was presented and was in question was somebody else's doing! That's where the blame goes. Your readers know (or should know) that you would not post anything of your own words and position without having first-hand knowledge or doing some research first. (You know what? That email has brought about more trouble than any measure of truth that may be in it. You actually did a favor by bringing it back in the limelight to prove how vicious some people can be so that others can be aware and not believe such things so easily.)
comment by donnamarie on Apr 30, 2008 11:54 AM ()
Oh Thank you! It definitely did me some good. I talked to hubby and sent the snopes' material on to the person who sent it to me. I am sure from his comment that he believed the material. So, some good came from this fiasco as you stated.
reply by angiedw on May 1, 2008 2:00 AM ()
I keep hearing the same thing as your email here. What the rednecks are really saying is: "I won't vote for a n-----, even if I have to libel him to keep him out of the White House. Prejudice is still alive and well in America. You are forgiven.
comment by elderjane on Apr 30, 2008 5:43 AM ()
I can honestly say that the color of one's skin does not contribute to my evaluation. I guess that is why I didn't think! I do have some prejudices that I didn't have after 911. I work constantly to try to overcome my aversion and fear.
reply by angiedw on May 1, 2008 2:02 AM ()
I don't feel as if you owe anyone an apology. I think things became a little overheated by some of the comments. A simple "hey, check this Snopes site out" would have sufficed, in my opinion.
No worries, sista, this is your space. Let it roll off your shoulders.
comment by walkwithgrace on Apr 29, 2008 10:18 PM ()
Angie, you have nothing to apologize for! You did nothing wrong. You are such a sweet person, I know that you didn't mean anything by it. Besides, you were asking others for their input. There's nothing wrong with that.
comment by hopefields on Apr 29, 2008 8:16 PM ()
I'm not too knowledgeable in politics either but try to read posts that some do and try to understand what they are saying. I'm learning by observing them. Honestly, I think I would have asked the same question that you did because I had never seen that before either.
reply by hopefields on May 1, 2008 9:14 AM ()
Thanks, sweetie. You are right; there was no malice involved. I had never seen it before, and I have found some whom I admire in this community with, what I judge as, knowledge that I do not have in politics. I wanted accurate information. That was my motivation.
reply by angiedw on May 1, 2008 2:06 AM ()
angie you are one of the sweetest people on here! please don't apologize, you didn't do anything wrong.
comment by elkhound on Apr 29, 2008 4:44 PM ()
It is pretty bad when you put your stupidity out there for everyone to see! I definitely need to become better informed, but really that is why I posted the darn thing. I wanted to see what the others knew about it--Well, I did!Thank you, sweetie.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:49 PM ()
oh don't apologise, hun. you were just askin'. I felt kinda bad because I mebee came off a bit strong and mebee I should have been a bit more subtle. So, tell me, what cabinet post would you like in the Bugg Administration? (Vice Poobah, Sec. of Ed., Attorney General and Ambasador to Hawaii are already spoken for

reguards
yer about to straighten the country out pal
bugg
comment by honeybugg on Apr 29, 2008 4:39 PM ()
Oh no--I didn't feel that it was a personal attack at all. I just felt bad for being so ignorant and perhaps opening up a can of worms--unintentionally! I would very much like to be ambassador, but I fear my mouth(fingers) might get us into trouble.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:42 PM ()
comment by dazeymae on Apr 29, 2008 1:35 PM ()
Thanks, girl.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:39 PM ()
Naaaa, that's not a problem, sweetie. I just posted some dumb email I got a couple of months back and then I did the Snopes thing. Found out it was a big huge hoax. Never be apologetic. You only offered it for our thoughts. NBD Love and
comment by teacherwoman on Apr 29, 2008 1:33 PM ()
From now on it's Snopes for me! Thank you for your kindness.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:44 PM ()
I too, don't think you have anything to apologize for Angie. You were just posting this and stated that it was an e-mail from the beginning and was asking input. You have nothing to apologize for in my opinion.
comment by texastar on Apr 29, 2008 1:24 PM ()
reply by texastar on Apr 29, 2008 4:54 PM ()
I just felt silly and didn't want to be considered an old trouble maker. I wanted some learned opinions, for I really didn't have a clue about the validity of the email. I need get back to the send and let him know. Thank girl.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:46 PM ()
You stated right from the get-go that this email was news to you and that you were interested in hearing input from others -- you never proclaimed to believe it. So, in my humble opinion, if you're only asking for insight, you have nothing to be sorry for. Like sunlight commented below, when I get sketchy emails I usually check'em out first at Snopes. It's a fantastic resource.
comment by mellowdee on Apr 29, 2008 12:54 PM ()
I'm definitely adding it to my list of favorites!!!!!!!!!!!!
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:50 PM ()
Dearest Angie, it's obvious that you never got this email before. The email has been around for awhile. The answers sound angry... They could have simply referred you to Snopes. Here are the pages:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/obama.asp#muslim
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp
comment by sunlight on Apr 29, 2008 12:33 PM ()
I copied and pasted the sites, checked them out and saved them in my favorites. I will copy and paste into an email for my friend so that he will not make the same mistake twice. Thank you so much.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 5:05 PM ()
Thank you so much. I am going to send these on to the person who sent me the email. He evidently doesn't know about snopes either, for he was very upset.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:53 PM ()
Yep, I sent her to Snopes as well. I went through this kind of thing before.
reply by teacherwoman on Apr 29, 2008 1:37 PM ()
I wouldn't apologize either. You shared an email.
comment by kristilyn3 on Apr 29, 2008 12:18 PM ()
I simply do not like conflict, and an apology didn't hurt me in any way. I appreciated their honesty since I really wanted their input. Thank you for your kindness; I really appreciate it.
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:55 PM ()
Well, it's your blog, and you asked for input... really nothing there to apologize for IMO.
comment by jjoohhnn on Apr 29, 2008 12:13 PM ()
Well, I thought maybe I had offended some by the posting. My apologizing didn't cost me anything and I felt better by extending it. I will check the validity elsewhere next time!
reply by angiedw on Apr 29, 2008 4:58 PM ()

Comment on this article   


82 articles found   [ Previous Article ]  [ Next Article ]  [ First ]  [ Last ]